Jify.co Exposed a Major Visibility Gap Between Estimated SEO Data and Reality
Exposed a Major Visibility Gap Between Estimated SEO Data and Reality
At a Glance
Metric | External SEO Tools | Actual Reality (via Erlin.ai) |
Reported Traffic Visibility | <1% captured | Full first-party visibility |
Traffic Baseline Accuracy | Estimated | Verified |
Primary AI Source | Not visible | Perplexity |
Secondary AI Source | Not visible | ChatGPT |
The Challenge: Optimization Based on Estimated Data
Jify.co had consistent inbound demand, but external SEO tools presented a distorted picture of performance.
From third-party estimates, the brand appeared to have minimal organic reach. This created a misleading narrative that traffic volume was low and growth was constrained.
In reality, the site was receiving significantly more engagement than external tools suggested.
The issue was not demand. It was a measurement.
The Constraint: No Access to Ground Truth
From an optimization standpoint, Jify faced three concrete limitations:
Estimation bias: External tools relied on scraped and inferred signals.
Strategy misalignment: Low estimated volume encouraged teams to optimize for the wrong opportunities.
Invisible AI traffic: No insight into how Answer Engines were driving discovery.
As a result, decisions were being made against an inaccurate baseline.
The Solution: Replace Estimation With First-Party Signals
Jify.co used Erlin.ai to move from inferred metrics to verified system data.
1. Integrating First-Party Analytics
Action: Connect Google Analytics and Search Console directly into Erlin.
This eliminated reliance on third-party estimates and surfaced actual user behavior across channels.
System effect:
The visibility baseline corrected from a narrow external estimate to full, verified coverage.
2. Isolating AI-Driven Discovery
Action: Break down AI referrals by engine.
Erlin separated AI traffic that typically sits inside generic “Direct” or “Referral” buckets.
Observed behavior:
Discovery was split evenly between citation-driven engines and conversational engines.
System effect:
Jify gained clarity on how users were finding them through AI systems , not just that AI traffic existed.
Results: From Guesswork to Precision
1. Baseline Correction
The most important outcome was not growth , it was accuracy.
External tools captured only a fraction of actual engagement.
First-party data revealed the full scope of inbound activity.
This reframed the strategy from “getting traffic” to optimizing traffic already in motion.
2. Identifying a Research-Driven Audience
The AI traffic pattern revealed a strong research bias.
Insight:
Users were relying on citation-based AI engines as much as conversational ones , indicating evaluation-stage behavior.
Execution impact:
Content strategy shifted toward:
Source credibility
Structured financial explanations
Citation-friendly formats for verification-focused AI systems
3. Accurate Geographic Signal
External tools overstated traffic concentration in certain regions.
First-party data allowed Jify to:
Separate volume from engagement
Understand which regions contributed meaningful downstream value
Allocate optimization effort based on real behavior, not inferred location data
Conclusion
Jify.co demonstrated that optimization built on estimated SEO data is fundamentally unreliable.
By using Erlin.ai to connect first-party analytics and isolate AI-driven discovery, they replaced assumption with accuracy, enabling decisions grounded in how users and AI systems were actually interacting with the product.
Sid Tiwatnee
Founder
Share
Boost your brand’s visibility in AI search.
See where you show up, spot what you’re missing, and turn AI discovery into revenue.
